與中國衝突 -
「威懾/嚇阻」是最好的策略！
德國第五大媒體集團IPPEN在德軍艦通過台灣海峽前特來專訪我。
軍艦通過後，其旗下四、五家報紙同步刊出，照片用的是之前德通社專訪我的，說是，喜歡這一張的感覺。
我有兩句話被用來作標題。
其一：
面對與中國的衝突 -
「威懾/嚇阻」是最好的策略！
其二：
若因中國（按：侵台）而生戰事，
全球均將蒙受損失。
不管是哪一句，我的重點都在點出：
台灣有事，全球有事。
因此，為了讓全球沒事 -
讓台灣沒事，就是全球的事！
「台灣海峽」也是「護國神山」也！
***
而全球事前聯手威懾及嚇阻中國，
絕對比事後經濟抵制乃至武力相抗
來得有效！
繼德國之後，
日本軍艦也通過台灣海峽。
為什麼？！
因為，若讓中國控制海峽，
則台灣失守。
台灣失守，
則往上，日本（及南韓）危矣。
往下，東協十國如菲律賓、越南等
加紐奧將任憑中國勒索、威脅。
亦即，東海、台海、南海、
西太平洋、甚至南太平洋
全將受制於中國。
大國如德英法等
除了與台灣理念相同，價值共享外，
也極依賴與印太各國的貿易，
當然無法忍受航運受控於中。
習近平以及挺中棄台論者
實在應該想想這句話：
「人不為己，天誅地滅」！
介紹 Sōseki: Modern Japan's Greatest Novelist by John Nathan ......魏哲家，謝志偉，德國總理蕭茲（Olaf Scholz）歐盟執委會主席……
https://www.facebook.com/hanching.chung/videos/382167891653774
魏哲家，謝志偉，德國總理蕭茲（Olaf Scholz）歐盟執委會主席范德賴恩（Ursula von der Leyen）...........歐巴馬與賀錦麗：志趣相投、投桃報李0821 “don’t sit around and complain about things. Do something.” (Michelle Obama’s Speech at the Democratic Convention).
Natsume Sōseki (夏目 漱石, 9 February 1867 – 9 December 1916),
Sōseki: Modern Japan's Greatest Novelist Book by John Nathan
介紹 Sōseki: Modern Japan's Greatest Novelist by John Nathan
Finally, after a long time, I got to complete this novel. The reason it took me a little more time to complete this novel is the beginning. It does not captivate you from the very start like other novels by Dostoevsky but it's worth it after some pages. The main theme of the book is the concept Dostoevsky has mentioned in his other works “Beauty will save the world.”
The story revolves around a prince named Myshkin, who is returning from Switzerland. On the train, he meets Rogozhin, an unstable man who inherited a large sum of fortune from his father. Myshkin is a clean-hearted, pious, and plain speaker about whatever he wants to say. He cannot even think of doing something bad to anyone and will forgive everyone, and for that reason, people call him Idiot, thinking he does not know anything. The second person he meets is Lebedev, a minor clerk who knows everything about Petersburg’s important people.
There is a love triangle between Myshkin, Nastasya, and Aglaya. Nastasya is an epitome of beauty, unpredictability, and confidence, and also the concubine of the aristocrat Totsky, from age 16. At one point, Myshkin gets engaged to her, but she runs away to Rogozhin because his mad and violent obsession resonates with her self-destructive urge. Aglaya, on the other hand, is a very predictable girl who falls for Myshkin but keeps saying that she does not have any affection for him at all and is quite cruel to him. She also abandoned Myshkin because, according to her, the prince was still in love with Nastasya. The soul of Myshkin gets tormented between these two. There is also a very fascinating character of Ippolit who is a young nihilist and is counting his last days because of tuberculosis. He always has a craving for love from others. He is unable to share Myshkin’s intuition of the harmonious unity of all Being, an intuition evoked most intensely earlier in the novel in a description of the pre-epileptic aura.
According to the prince, Catholicism is an unChristian faith and that it preaches antichrist. He believed they fought just for political supremacy and it gave birth to atheism. There is no difference between the Roman Empire and the Catholic Church; they both exploit humans just for earthly gains. And what exactly is beauty? Beauty is the way you want to define it. If beauty lies in something ideal, then it can never be achieved, and if it is something like rational facts presented, then there is no unifying principle that tells us what to do with them. In terms of rational explanation, beauty is defined by many principles of mathematics like the golden ratio. Still, postmodernism argues that it is a constructed view that supports some systems such as patriarchy.
Myshkin, in the triangle of love, was also in despair because of these two. The example of Christ is presented here as someone who acts as a bridge between these two extremes; he reaches up to heaven to his father and reaches down to hell when he touches the ground and takes all of the sins of humans upon himself. But in this rational age, the bridge is broken, making many other people like Myshkin an Idiot. In the end, the prince ends up in the same condition as he was before visiting Russia because he could not hold on.
www.instagram.com/talha.books
沒有留言:
張貼留言